Posted By Lynn Worthy, Sun Staff
The Knicks may not be in awe, but you might have heard some folks saying awe shucks, awe damn, and awe … well, you get the idea.
Despite New York Knicks swingman Quentin Richardson’s comments on how over-hyped the Celtics have been (see Friday‘s Sun for more on that), Boston greeted their visitors with a 104-59 dismantling at the TD Banknorth Garden. The 59 points was just one-point away from the Knicks franchise low.
The score pretty much speaks for itself, but Knicks president of basketball operations and head coach Isiah Thomas elaborated for anyone looking for a little added emphasis.
“We take two steps forward and one giant step back,” he said. “And I don’t know where this game came from. I thought we played extremely selfish tonight in terms of no ball movement. We didn’t screen for each other. We definitely didn’t see this type of game coming after the last two games that we played ant the way we were playing and moving. This was just not a good night.”
New York shot 30 percent from the field, and had just one player score in double digits (Nate Robinson, 11 points).
They were also out-rebounded (40-28), lost he turnover battle (forced nine, gave away 15), gave up more points in the paint (28 to 26), allowed more second chance points (11 to five), and scored six fast break points to the Celtics’ 17.
They were beat every which way, and they trailed by as much as 52 points at one time during the game.
Paul Pierce and Ray Allen recorded 21 points each, Kevin Garnett had eight points and 11 rebounds, Glen “Big Baby” Davis scored 13 and hauled in six boards. Rajon Rondo finished with 10 points and seven assists.

Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
Posted By Lynn Worthy, Sun Staff
Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
I watched Saturday night’s Celtics game in a restaurant with a small television set. People slowly filtered toward the monitor as the clock wound down to the precious few seconds, before erupting into a roar as Ray Allen drained the game-winning three ball after an improbable steal. Such a reaction has been fairly commonplace for Red Sox and Patriots games the last few years, but it’s been a long time since the Green Machine garnered such a response. For those of us who remember an estimated million and a half people turning out to City Hall Plaza in Boston to celebrate the 1986 championship, it was yet another indication that this sleeping giant of a basketball town is awakening from its slumber.
Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
All that said, the Patriots are a well-coached, talented, veteran team that knows how to play in the clutch. Once they realized Moss wasn’t going to be allowed to decide the game, Brady and company switched to the short and quick passing game that had been a staple of the less talented New England squads of previous years. When they had to, they got the job done and in the end, a “W” is a “W” whether you cover the spread or not. It’s nice to see the Pats can still tough out victories when they have to. Chances are, they’ll be called upon to do so come January.
Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
I also agree with Dennis calling the injury excuses overblown. I was very uncomfortable reading week after week about Lowell’s injuries. Sure, they had them. But any great football coach will tell you when you give players an excuse to fail, they’ll fail. The coach should have banned any injury talk, not led the way with it, which I felt Pare sometimes did.



Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
Posted By Lynn Worthy, Sun Staff
Three consecutive trips to “football’s” title contest and four overall. Three consecutive losses in “football’s” title contest and four overall. I’d jump on the bandwagon with all the other writers comparing the New England Revolution to the Buffalo Bills, except people in Buffalo actually cared about the Bills.
Already, the Wiseguys are speculating the Pats will be giving 25-points or more that Sunday. Judging by what you’ve seen so far and knowing the animosity that exists between Belichick and Mangini (a mentor-disciple feud hasn’t gotten this ugly since Darth Vader and Obi Wan Kenobi swung light sabers at each other), how big of a favorite would Tom Brady and company have to be before you’d even consider betting on the Jets? 30-points? 40?
Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff
Oh, and while we’re at it, let’s make sure to credit New England’s players and coaches for their intelligence and decision making. The Pats are prepared for every game situation, every scenario, and make the right choice an incredibly high percentage of the time. As I watch the rest of the league, this point is reinforced even more.
Posted by Teddy Panos, Sun Staff


You see, like the Sox and Pats of today, the Celtics used to be the team all others measured themselves against. Whereas brides and grooms now try to avoid October and January weddings, they used to shy away from May and June nuptials in the 80’s, lest all their male guests disappear for hours to huddle around the nearest television. I was the most popular guy at my college Senior Ball in 1987, not because of the snazzy tux I donned, but because of the little Sony Watchman I brought along to catch the Eastern Conference Finals against Bill Laimbeer and the dastardly Pistons. (Needless to say, things didn’t work out long-term with my date that evening)
You also must learn that a big game in April is one that decides home court advantage in the playoffs, not ping-pong balls in the draft lottery, so cheer accordingly. Oh, and for you old-timers going to the Gah-den for the first time since Bird, McHale and Parish walked through that door; those people in tight shorts are called cheerleaders, not the Big Three.

