Categories

  • Lowell Sun
  • N.H. Broadcaster
  • The Valley Dispatch
  • Sentinel & Enterprise
  • Nashoba Publishing
  • Purchase Photos
  • The Gallery of Homes
  • N.E. Bridal Guide
  • Dine-In New England
  • My Auto Showcase
  • Sun Media Careers

    « Deval Patrick: The joke's on us | Main | The Power of Sheriff DiPaola »

    March 27, 2007

    Donahue is A Democrat

    Donaghue%2C-Eileen05.gif
    What does the political affliation filing mistake by Eileen Donoghue's campaign staff tell us? Either the staffers don't know their candidate or they're asleep at the wheel. Neither can be tolerated if Donoghue is to overcome better known rivals like Niki Tsongas and Middlesex Sheriff Jim DiPaola in the Fifth District congressional race. Donoghue's campaign made a mistake when it listed the candidates party affiliation as Independent and not Democrat on her official statement of candidacy filed with the Federal Election Committee. Matt Murphy of The Sun's Statehouse bureau uncovered the story Saturday while researching FEC records. At first, he thought Donoghue's campaign was making a bold political move. By running as an Independent, Donoghue would avoid a costly primary knocking heads with Democrats' Tsongas, DiPaola, and state Reps. Barry Finegold, Jamie Eldridge and Jim Miceli. She'd be able to hone her message to a wide range of voters,including the district's 198,514 unenrolled voters. The big advantage would be that Donogheu would have money to burn for the general election. There are drawbacks to the strategy, though. By denying her Democratic roots, Donoghue risks alienating a big core group of voters. Even many unenrolled voters have strong Democrat tendencies. Plus, she'd be signaling a sort of desperation that she couldn't beat Tsongas, DiPaola or the others in a crowded primary race. DiPaola, especially, would be hurt by Donoghue's Independent status. His campaign operatives are hoping for Tsongas and Donoghue to carve up the Lowell area vote; if Tsonhgas were given a free pass in the primary, she'd pull in a huge plurality that would be hard for any candidate to overcome, so the strategists say. Is Donoghue, however, a real Democrat? Her historic profile says she is but just like any politician, she has a strain of opportunism in her. According to the Lowell Election Office, Donoghue first registered as a Democrat in Lowell 1988. She stayed a Democrat until May 2, 2006, when she changed her party affiliation to unenrolled. Donoghue changed her party affiliation back to Democrat on Feb. 21, 2007. Why the switch? Only the candidate knows for sure, but the date of her political transformation coincides with Beacon Hill talk that Donoghue was in line to be nominated for a district court judgeship by then-Republican Gov. Mitt Romney. The nomination never came, and Donoghue returned to her Democratic roots. The latest rumor circulating Lowell is that Gov. Deval Patrick will offer Donoghue a judgeship to take her out of the Fifth District race, thereby clearing a path for Tsongas. This is pure poppycock, say Beacon Hill insiders. Whatever, Eileen Donoghue is a very competent lawyer and city councilor and certainly stacks up well with her Democratic rivals in what is shaping up as a competive congressional race. Still, it would have been interesting to see her break away from the pack as an Independent for Democrats, thus guaranteeing herself a spot in the general election.

    Posted by JimC at March 27, 2007 8:26 AM

    Comments

    Jim,

    You ask, "What does the political affiliation filing mistake by Eileen Donoghue's campaign staff tell us?" My answer: It tells us little. What is telling is her switch from Democrat to unenrolled to Democrat again. That tells me she is full-- to the point of overflowing--of the "strain of opportunism" (your words,Jim) which is a cancer in all office seekers. I am not picking on her, for all pols share this ambition for increased opportunity, for power. Nor am I questioning her political accomplishments and qualifications. I just have a problem with this Clintonesque flip-flopping. Not excusing Bill,but such behavior is part and parcel inherent in all pols of all stripes. It's as old as mud-slinging. It's as old as human nature. To paraphrase Niccolo Machiavelli in his book The Prince--written in 1513 to those seeking to govern: All principles must give way to circumstance--to do anything necessary to achieve power through political office.

    This is the nature of politics.

    However, it doesn't mean I have to rah-rah a politician as she compromises her convictions in the name of political expendiency or personal gain. Perhaps I've watched too many episodes of "West Wing," but I'm holding out hope someday a candidate will put his or her ideals and beliefs before sucking up. Perhaps I am naive.

    In the gospel of Luke, Jesus says to his twelve apostles, "Woe to you when all men speak well of you." To parody Abe Lincoln, "You can please some of the people all of the time; all of the people some of the time; but you can't please all of the people all of the time." The problem in politics? Too many people to please and too many campaign dollars to lose if one doesn't kiss everybody's posterior. Is there any room left for integrity in the vacuum created by selling out? It makes me wonder why anybody who has any self-respect would go into politics these days. Maybe it has always been this way. I'm just not old enough, like you Jim, to remember.

    However, just once before I get killed taking a left onto Bridge street from the VFW Parkway, and using another biblical allusion, I would like to see a politician who didn't sell his or her birthright for a bowl of porridge. I would like to see a politician who didn't lap-dance for dollars and recognition on corporate Americas or Hollywood's pelvis. I would like to see a politician who isn't afraid to change his mind on an issue if he came to a newly informed and intelligent decision. I would like to see a leader who isn't swayed by every wind of change, and kept her own counsel, who didn't hold constant court with jesters and clowns.

    Perhaps I am naive. But not too naive to know when a politician is playing politics as usual.

    Posted by: Roger Gavin at March 27, 2007 11:54 PM

    Donahue is not Democrat, Republican or Independant. She's an Opportunist.

    Posted by: Donkeys 'R Us at March 28, 2007 10:16 AM

    What politician isn't an opportunist? Actually, if we are to believe Eileen Donoghue, she was acting on "insider" information that Marty Meehan was about to leave Congress sometime around May 2006.. Chancellor Bill Hogan left his job at UMass Lowell in July. She might have been jumping the gun when she switched from Democrat to unenrolled.. At least the chronology doesn't add up unless she did have inside information. As it was, the info wasn't credible because Meehan didn't make his move until four months later.
    Regardless, I think Donoghue is a true-blue Democrat. But if she had a judgeship dangled in front of her face, from a Republican Governor (MItt Romney) would she switch to unenrolled if she had to?
    Several years ago, Mike Stanton of the Providence Journal wrote a great book on Providence Mayor Vincent "Buddy" Cianci. It's called "the Prince of Tides." Stanton writes how Cianci passed on a chance to run for U.s. Senator at the height of his popularity, soon after being elected mayor in Providence. He never got the chance again. Cianci stepped aside so that John Chafee, loser in the gubernatorial race, could run. Cianci never thought Chafee could win, but he did. And he held onto the seat for two terms. In the meantime, Cianci's troubles soared and his popularity tanked. He eventually went to jail for six years and is due out this spring.
    The point is: Timing and opportunity are everything in politics.

    Posted by: jim campanini at March 29, 2007 4:37 PM

    Why would she switch to unenrolled because of Meehan stepping aside? Doesn't make a bit of sense. If she had inside info, she would have stayed Democrat to run for his seat wouldn't she?
    We all know politicians lie but this one is a whopper. You have to at least make it believable.

    Posted by: Donkeys 'R Us at April 4, 2007 3:07 PM

    Post a comment




    Remember Me?


    June 2007

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30